Thailand - World Bank Country Survey 2013

Primary tabs

The World Bank is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in Thailand or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The World Bank Country Assessment Survey is meant to give the World Bank's team that works in Thailand, greater insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the World Bank uses to assess the views of its critical stakeholders. With this understanding, the World Bank hopes to develop more effective strategies, outreach and programs that support development in Thailand. The World Bank commissioned an independent firm to oversee the logistics of this effort in Thailand. The survey was designed to achieve the following objectives: - Assist the World Bank in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Thailand perceive the Bank; - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in Thailand regarding: · Their views regarding the general environment in Thailand; · Their overall attitudes toward the World Bank in Thailand; · Overall impressions of the World Bank's effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Thailand; and · Perceptions of the World Bank's future role in Thailand. - Use data to help inform Thailand country team's strategy.

Acronym: 
WBCS 2013
Type: 
Microdata
Topics: 
Topic not specified
Languages Supported: 
English
Geographical Coverage: 
Thailand
Reference ID: 
THA_2013_WBCS_v01_M
Release Date: 
December 19, 2013

Harvest Source

Harvest Source: 
Microdata

Harvest Source ID

Harvest Source ID: 
5286

Last Updated

Last Updated: 
January 27, 2014
Study Type: 

Opinion survey

Primary Investigator Name, Affiliation: 
Public Opinion Research Group - The World Bank Group
Questionnaires: 
The Questionnaire consists of 8 Sections: A. General Issues Facing Thailand: Respondents were asked to indicate what they thought were the top three most important development priorities in the country. B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank: Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the World Bank, the Bank’s effectiveness in Thailand, Bank staff preparedness to help Thailand solve its development challenges, their agreement with various statements regarding the Bank’s work, and the extent to which the Bank is an effective development partner. Respondents were also asked to indicate the sectoral areas on which it would be most productive for the Bank to focus its resources, the Bank’s greatest values and greatest weaknesses in its work, the most effective instruments in helping to reduce poverty in Thailand, with which stakeholder groups the Bank should collaborate more, and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts. C. World Bank Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the Bank’s work helps achieve development results in Thailand and the extent to which the Bank meets Thailand’s needs for knowledge services and financial instruments. D. The World Bank’s Knowledge: Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they consult Bank knowledge work, the areas on which the Bank should focus its research efforts, and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the Bank’s knowledge work/activities, including how significant of a contribution they makes to development results and the technical quality. E. Working with the World Bank: Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the Bank, such as the World Bank’s “Safeguard Policy” requirements being reasonable, the Bank imposing reasonable conditions on its lending, disbursing funds promptly, increasing Thailand’s institutional capacity, and providing effective implementation support, etc. F. The Future Role of the World Bank in Thailand: Respondents were asked to rate how significant a role the Bank should play in Thailand’s development in the near future and to indicate what the Bank should do to make itself of greater value. G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the Bank, and their usage and evaluation of the Bank’s websites. Respondents were asked about their awareness of the Bank’s Access to Information policy, past information requests from the Bank, and their level of agreement that they use more data from the World Bank as a result of the Bank’s Open Data policy. Respondents were also asked about their level of agreement that they know how to find information from the Bank and that the Bank is responsive to information requests. They were also asked to indicate how often they access World Bank information online and how valuable they consider the information they receive from the Bank’s social media channels. Respondents also indicated the type of e-services they are currently subscribed to. H. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the World Bank, their exposure to the Bank in Thailand, and their geographic location.
Response Rates: 
A total of 110 stakeholders participated in the survey (35% response rate).
Sampling Procedure: 
In March-May 2013, 315 stakeholders of the World Bank in Thailand were invited to provide their opinions on the Bank's assistance to the country by participating in a country survey. Participants in the survey were drawn from among the Office of the Prime Minister; the office of a Parliamentarian; employees of a ministry, ministerial department, or implementation agency; consultants/ contractors working on World Bank-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials or staff; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; civil society organizations; community-based organization; the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups, academia/research institutes/think tanks; judiciary branches, and other organizations.
Unit of Analysis: 
Stakeholder

No Visualizations Available.

Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include: - the Identification of the Primary Investigator - the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation) - the survey reference number - the source and date of download

The World Bank is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in Thailand or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The World Bank Country Assessment Survey is meant to give the World Bank's team that works in Thailand, greater insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the World Bank uses to assess the views of its critical stakeholders. With this understanding, the World Bank hopes to develop more effective strategies, outreach and programs that support development in Thailand. The World Bank commissioned an independent firm to oversee the logistics of this effort in Thailand. The survey was designed to achieve the following objectives: - Assist the World Bank in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Thailand perceive the Bank; - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in Thailand regarding: · Their views regarding the general environment in Thailand; · Their overall attitudes toward the World Bank in Thailand; · Overall impressions of the World Bank's effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Thailand; and · Perceptions of the World Bank's future role in Thailand. - Use data to help inform Thailand country team's strategy.

FieldValue
Modified Date
2017-09-06
Release Date
Identifier
7eac2bd8-bf2f-441b-a081-8cb518983fb6
License
License Not Specified
Contact Email
Rating: 
0
No votes yet
Reference ID: 
THA_2013_WBCS_v01_M
Acronym: 
WBCS 2013
Type: 
Languages Supported: 
Response Rates: 
A total of 110 stakeholders participated in the survey (35% response rate).
Time Periods: 
August, 2017
Primary Investigator Name, Affiliation: 
Public Opinion Research Group - The World Bank Group
Terms of Use: 
Unit of Analysis: 
Stakeholder
Geographical Coverage: 
Data Classification of a Dataset: 
Sampling Procedure: 
In March-May 2013, 315 stakeholders of the World Bank in Thailand were invited to provide their opinions on the Bank's assistance to the country by participating in a country survey. Participants in the survey were drawn from among the Office of the Prime Minister; the office of a Parliamentarian; employees of a ministry, ministerial department, or implementation agency; consultants/ contractors working on World Bank-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials or staff; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; civil society organizations; community-based organization; the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups, academia/research institutes/think tanks; judiciary branches, and other organizations.
Release Date: 
Thursday, December 19, 2013
Last Updated Date: 
Monday, January 27, 2014
Questionnaires: 
The Questionnaire consists of 8 Sections: A. General Issues Facing Thailand: Respondents were asked to indicate what they thought were the top three most important development priorities in the country. B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank: Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the World Bank, the Bank’s effectiveness in Thailand, Bank staff preparedness to help Thailand solve its development challenges, their agreement with various statements regarding the Bank’s work, and the extent to which the Bank is an effective development partner. Respondents were also asked to indicate the sectoral areas on which it would be most productive for the Bank to focus its resources, the Bank’s greatest values and greatest weaknesses in its work, the most effective instruments in helping to reduce poverty in Thailand, with which stakeholder groups the Bank should collaborate more, and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts. C. World Bank Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the Bank’s work helps achieve development results in Thailand and the extent to which the Bank meets Thailand’s needs for knowledge services and financial instruments. D. The World Bank’s Knowledge: Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they consult Bank knowledge work, the areas on which the Bank should focus its research efforts, and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the Bank’s knowledge work/activities, including how significant of a contribution they makes to development results and the technical quality. E. Working with the World Bank: Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the Bank, such as the World Bank’s “Safeguard Policy” requirements being reasonable, the Bank imposing reasonable conditions on its lending, disbursing funds promptly, increasing Thailand’s institutional capacity, and providing effective implementation support, etc. F. The Future Role of the World Bank in Thailand: Respondents were asked to rate how significant a role the Bank should play in Thailand’s development in the near future and to indicate what the Bank should do to make itself of greater value. G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the Bank, and their usage and evaluation of the Bank’s websites. Respondents were asked about their awareness of the Bank’s Access to Information policy, past information requests from the Bank, and their level of agreement that they use more data from the World Bank as a result of the Bank’s Open Data policy. Respondents were also asked about their level of agreement that they know how to find information from the Bank and that the Bank is responsive to information requests. They were also asked to indicate how often they access World Bank information online and how valuable they consider the information they receive from the Bank’s social media channels. Respondents also indicated the type of e-services they are currently subscribed to. H. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the World Bank, their exposure to the Bank in Thailand, and their geographic location.
Harvest Source: 
Harvest Source ID: 
5286
Citation Text: 
Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include: - the Identification of the Primary Investigator - the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation) - the survey reference number - the source and date of download
Modified date: 
16097
Study Type: 
Opinion survey
Primary Dataset: 
Yes
Mode of Data Collection: 

Mail Questionnaire

Data Access and Licensing

This dataset is classified as Public under the Access to Information Classification Policy. Users inside and outside the Bank can access this dataset.

This dataset is made available under the World Bank Microdata Research License

Share Metadata

The information on this page (the dataset metadata) is also available in these formats.

PRINT EMAIL JSON RDF